Call Us : +1-866-369-CERT (2378)
Email : info@securisksolutions.com
Many major news carriers found it important to carry the news today that “Obama orders a 60-day cybersecurity review”. Some stated that “Cybersecurity is now one of the major national security problems facing the United States”, while in reality, it is actually a major INTERNATIONAL security problem facing the ENTIRE GLOBE (not just the United States). Other references were made to th need for the White House to
All of these are absolutely important and critical issues that cannot be ignored, but one major issue missing in these is the PEOPLE component of cybersecurity. As my whitepapers have repeatedly eluded to, People are the FIRST line of DEFENSE; technical security controls are rendered futile by people who are not aware of how to protect their own computing ecosystem.
I was  privileged to be in the audience of the Commission on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency on the day  (December 29), their report was released for public viewing, where the panelists - Rep. Jim Langevin (D. R.I), Rep. Michael McCaul (R. TX), Lt. General Harry D. Raduege Jr. USAF, retd.) Deloitte & Touche and Marcus Sachs, Verizon Comunications participated.
Highlights from the panel I captured are given below.
“It is Imperative as a nation that cybersecurity is taken into account seriously for the liveability of the nation. If not we have failed as a nation.”Â
From the press release it seems to be like President Obama is taken cybersecurity into account seriously. Only time will tell of the liveability of this nation and the world. It’s about time that cybersecurity was in the forefront.
Are there other questions (than the ones listed below) that take more precedence that an Information Security Professional/Leader/Executive needs to be able to answer in the board room? If so, please respond …
1. What is the Revenue to the company?
2. What is the Cost to the company?
3. What are the Risks to the company?
Additionally thoughts on how these questions can be answered from an information security perspective is welcome.
Posted by (2) Comment
1982 Machine of the Year was the Computer and the 2006 year end issue of Time magazine has “You” - the IT Professional as the Person of the Year.
With the continued focus and increased attention on information security, many information security professionals find themselves to be in constant demand. What makes these InfoSec Professionals to be sought after? (See DNA of an effective InfoSec Professional) and the real question would be will 2007Â be not just the Year of “You-the IT Professional” but also the Year of the “InfoSec” Professional?
Just wondering, in today’s day and age, what constitutes the DNA of an effective InfoSec Professional -
Is it one who is versatile with a breadth of experience across various technology or is it someone who is super specializes in one area of security? Is it one with an entreprenuerial spirit, a visionary, …
I would like to compile various opinions as to what one thought was the DNA of an effective InfoSec Professional
Merriam-Webster defines effective as “producing a decided, decisive, or desired effect”Â